1979 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 has manual transmission. 1979 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | LJ 50 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 539 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2490 mm |