1979 Toyota Celica vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 546 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Celica | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Celica | 265 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 82 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2660 mm |