1979 Toyota Celica vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Celica weights approximately 210 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Celica | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Toyota | Smart |
Model | Celica | ForFour |
Year Released | 1979 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1332 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |