1979 Toyota Celica vs. 2005 Volvo C70
To start off, 2005 Volvo C70 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo C70 weights approximately 481 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo C70 (341 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Toyota Celica | 2005 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | C70 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2383 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 341 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1661 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2720 mm |
