1979 Toyota Celica vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 440 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (262 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Celica | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
Model | Celica | CTS |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 262 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2890 mm |