1979 Toyota Celica vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC70 (240 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 701 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Celica | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Celica | XC70 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 3200 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2815 mm |