1979 Toyota Celica vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 957 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Celica | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Celica | XC90 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2563 cc | 3200 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2137 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2857 mm |