1979 Toyota Tercel vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 692 kg more than 1979 Toyota Tercel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1979 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1979 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Toyota Tercel | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Tercel | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 822 kg | 1514 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4442 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2619 mm |
