1979 Triumph TR8 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Triumph TR8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Triumph TR8 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ka weights approximately 151 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8.
Because 1979 Triumph TR8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Triumph TR8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Triumph TR8 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Triumph | Ford |
| Model | TR8 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2450 mm |
