1979 Triumph TR8 vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Triumph TR8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Triumph TR8 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Kia Cee'd. (124 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 502 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8.
Because 1979 Triumph TR8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Triumph TR8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Triumph TR8 | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Triumph | Kia |
Model | TR8 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 124 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 85.4 mm |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2660 mm |