1979 Triumph TR8 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Triumph TR8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Triumph TR8 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8.
Because 1979 Triumph TR8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Triumph TR8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Triumph TR8 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Triumph | Mazda |
Model | TR8 | 2 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 95 HP |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2489 mm |