1979 Volkswagen Golf vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 1979 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1979 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 1978 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Volkswagen Golf | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Golf | 264 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1457 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2650 mm |