1979 Volvo 260 vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 396 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 260. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 260 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Volvo 260 | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Volvo | Pagani |
Model | 260 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |