1979 Volvo 66 vs. 2011 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi RVR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi RVR weights approximately 555 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Volvo 66 | 2011 Mitsubishi RVR | |
Make | Volvo | Mitsubishi |
Model | 66 | RVR |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4295 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1631 mm |