1979 Zastava 1500 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Zastava 1500 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Zastava 1500 (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Zastava 1500 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Zastava | Zastava |
Model | 1500 | 102 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |