1979 Zastava 1500 vs. 2011 Audi A1
To start off, 2011 Audi A1 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A1 (104 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1500.
Because 1979 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A1 (250 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Zastava 1500 | 2011 Audi A1 | |
Make | Zastava | Audi |
Model | 1500 | A1 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3954 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1416 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2469 mm |