1979 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 750. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 750.
Because 1979 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 750. (51 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Zastava 750 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Zastava | Holden |
| Model | 750 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 766 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 51 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
