1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1956 Austin A 95
To start off, 1980 Abarth A 112 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1956 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 1956 Austin A 95 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | A 112 | A 95 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 92 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2690 mm |
