1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1980 Abarth A 112 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 840 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | A 112 | Polara |
Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2960 mm |