1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1964 Simca 1000
To start off, 1980 Abarth A 112 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Abarth A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Simca 1000 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1964 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 1964 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Simca |
| Model | A 112 | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2230 mm |
