1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1965 Austin A 90
To start off, 1980 Abarth A 112 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 90 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 1965 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | A 112 | A 90 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |