1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1980 Abarth A 112 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |