1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1982 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 751 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1980 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 1982 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 87 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |