1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 405 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |