1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 1984 Volvo 240
To start off, 1984 Volvo 240 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Volvo 240 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 1984 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 1984 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | A 112 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |
