1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 925 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |
