1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1980 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |