1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Kuga weights approximately 855 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Kuga |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |