1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Toyota Sequoia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota Sequoia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1980 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 272 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |