1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet weights approximately 1328 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | A 112 | Murano CrossCabriolet |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2013 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4829 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1681 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2824 mm |
