1980 Abarth A 112 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1901 kg more than 1980 Abarth A 112.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche has automatic transmission and 1980 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Abarth A 112 | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 112 | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2586 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5621 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1946 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3302 mm |
