1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 652 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 179 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1752 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3210 mm |
