1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 195 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (177 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | 179 | XK |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 63 L |
