1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 560 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
| Model | 179 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 6392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1660 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
