1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 (177 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
Model | 179 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |