1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Volvo 164 (241 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (177 Nm). This means 1972 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | 179 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1360 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
