1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (177 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 179 | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 77 L |
