1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 2004 Citroen C5
To start off, 2004 Citroen C5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C5. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C5 weights approximately 519 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Because 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 (177 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C5. (112 Nm). This means 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 2004 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
Model | 179 | C5 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1619 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 66 L |