1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (300 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 682 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS (273 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (177 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 179 | STS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1782 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |