1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 (156 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6. (215 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Seat |
| Model | Alfa 6 | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2520 mm |
