1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1945 Armstrong Siddeley 16 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Armstrong Siddeley |
Model | Alfasud | 16 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1945 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.2 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2930 mm |