1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Alfasud | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1186 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 153 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 107 L |
