1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 770 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (111 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | Alfasud | Dakota |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.2 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 83 L |