1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (129 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 700 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alfa Romeo Giulietta | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Giulietta | Tundra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1961 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 100 L |