1980 Alpine A 310 vs. 2000 Lada Vaz
To start off, 2000 Lada Vaz is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Vaz weights approximately 65 kg more than 1980 Alpine A 310.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Alpine A 310. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Alpine A 310 (203 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 1980 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz. 2000 Lada Vaz has automatic transmission and 1980 Alpine A 310 has manual transmission. 1980 Alpine A 310 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Vaz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alpine A 310 | 2000 Lada Vaz | |
Make | Alpine | Lada |
Model | A 310 | Vaz |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2500 mm |