1980 Alpine A 310 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1980 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alpine A 310. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Alpine A 310 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 310 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2380 mm |