1980 Audi 100 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Audi 100 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 100 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | 62 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1921 cc | 6390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3310 mm |