1980 Audi 100 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1980 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 64 kg more than 1980 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 100 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |