1980 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1980 Audi 100. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 100.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 100. (124 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 100 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 100 | UTE |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |