1980 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 100 | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Armada |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1921 cc | 5600 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3129 mm |